[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: gmsl
From: |
PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\) |
Subject: |
RE: gmsl |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:56:21 -0500 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Graham-Cumming [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of John Graham-Cumming
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 6:55 AM
> To: PATTON, BILLY (SBCSI)
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: gmsl
>
>
> PATTON, BILLY (SBCSI) wrote:
> > If you haven't tried it, I recommend it. It has helped a lot for my
> > project.
> >
> > Only thing I would like to see about it is to get rid of
> the 2 files.
> > reduce it to just one.
>
> Glad you like it.
>
> The two files were done for a reason. The gmsl file won't include
> __gmsl if it's already been included, and to save time the gmsl file
> itself is small. So if a project were to include gmsl all over the
> place it would be quick, whereas if gmsl had all of __gmsl in it it
> would be slower.
>
> In what way does having two files cause you problems?
Not really a problem, just one more file :(
Originally I tried
include /some_path/gmsl
It gave me a warning of something like cannot find __gmsl
My vpath's are going to be complex and large before I'm finished but I
don't want to
add more to it than necessary. It's just a minor inconvienence, not a
problem.
>
> John.
> --
> John Graham-Cumming
> address@hidden
>
> Home: http://www.jgc.org/
> Blog: http://www.jgc.org/blog/
>
> POPFile: http://getpopfile.org/
> GNU Make Standard Library: http://gmsl.sf.net/
> GNU Make Debugger: http://gmd.sf.net/
> Fast, Parallel Builds: http://www.electric-cloud.com/
>
> Sign up for my Spam and Anti-spam Newsletter
> at http://www.jgc.org/
>
- gmsl, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 2006/04/12
- Re: gmsl, John Graham-Cumming, 2006/04/12
- RE: gmsl,
PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\) <=
- Re: gmsl, John Graham-Cumming, 2006/04/12