[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: improvements for parallel makes ?
From: |
Meinecke, Jon |
Subject: |
RE: improvements for parallel makes ? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:50:10 -0500 |
>> There is also a thread on a .WAIT proposal from last year on one of
>> the make mailing lists which discusses a number of scenarios. You
may
>> have already read that one.
>
> Yes, it's me who started that thread a year ago :)
Isn't .WAIT just a short hand for a dependency relationship?
foobar : a b c .WAIT D E F
Isn't this the same as
foobar : a b c D E F
D E F : a b c
Would it be possible to easily implement .WAIT to
simply generate this dependency? Or am I missing
something?
Jon Meinecke
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, (continued)
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Boris Kolpackov, 2006/04/06
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Alexey Neyman, 2006/04/06
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Christophe LYON, 2006/04/06
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Alexey Neyman, 2006/04/20
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Paul D. Smith, 2006/04/20
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Alexey Neyman, 2006/04/20
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Paul D. Smith, 2006/04/20
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Christophe LYON, 2006/04/20
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Alexey Neyman, 2006/04/20
- Re: improvements for parallel makes ?, Christophe LYON, 2006/04/21
RE: improvements for parallel makes ?,
Meinecke, Jon <=