[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: order and parallelism
From: |
Philip Guenther |
Subject: |
Re: order and parallelism |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:41:38 -0600 |
On 6/9/06, Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
%% "PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\)" <address@hidden> writes:
pb> I if have a rule
pb> all : b c d e f g
...
pb> Will it be b c d that go first?
pb> Or is it random?
In this environment it will definitely be b c d that goes first.
...where "goes" means "is considered for possible updating" and _not_
"has the commands associated with it executed".
If you want to (reliably) control the latter, you must do so via
prerequisites between the involved targets.
Philip Guenther