[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make dependency check
From: |
Paul D. Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Make dependency check |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:05:38 -0500 |
On Friday, 24 November, Philip Guenther (address@hidden) wrote:
> > Offhand I'd say that makedepend, being created for C programs, doesn't
> > understand the C++ header file syntax like #include <utility> (with no .h).
>
> The problem isn't one of syntax (you can have headers without the .h
> in C as well), but rather that makedepend doesn't know the proper
> include path for C++.
Probably I'm just showing my ignorance WRT C++ but somehow I had it in my head
that the no-.h header files were allowed to be pre-compiled or included in the
compiler (rather than being separate files) or similar.
If it's just another way to access the same old header files then as Philip
says it's just a matter of finding the right directories and adding them to
your makedepend invocation.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- Re: Make dependency check, Geraldin Arthy, 2006/11/21
- Re: Make dependency check, Paul D. Smith, 2006/11/21
- Re: Make dependency check, Geraldin Arthy, 2006/11/22
- Re: Make dependency check, Paul D. Smith, 2006/11/22
- Re: Make dependency check, Geraldin Arthy, 2006/11/24
- Re: Make dependency check, Paul D. Smith, 2006/11/24
- Re: Make dependency check, Philip Guenther, 2006/11/24
- Re: Make dependency check,
Paul D. Smith <=
- Re: Make dependency check, Philip Guenther, 2006/11/25
- Re: Make dependency check, Geraldin Arthy, 2006/11/24
- Re: Make dependency check, Dave Hylands, 2006/11/24