[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improvement on parallel make
From: |
Philip Guenther |
Subject: |
Re: Improvement on parallel make |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:23:15 -0700 |
[Dang it, fingers slipped and I sent while still editting. So to continue...]
Note that the desired makefile mentioned above:
local_objects = a.o b.o c.o d.o
all: all-recursive .WAIT all-local
all-recursive:
$(MAKE) -C subdir all
all-local: $(local_objects)
can *currently* be implemented like this:
local_objects = a.o b.o c.o d.o
all: all-recursive
$(MAKE) all-local
all-recursive:
$(MAKE) -C subdir all
all-local: $(local_objects)
The choice to use recursive make means you've given up on maximizing
your parallelism (because your dependency tree has to be a superset of
the real tree). As long as you've burned that bridge, why not use it
here to express the ordering?
Philip Guenther
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Philip Guenther, 2006/12/11
- Re: Improvement on parallel make, Alexey Neyman, 2006/12/11
- Re: Improvement on parallel make, Philip Guenther, 2006/12/11
- Re: Improvement on parallel make, Brendan Heading, 2006/12/11
- Re: Improvement on parallel make, Paul Smith, 2006/12/11
- Re: Improvement on parallel make, Paul Smith, 2006/12/11
- Re: Improvement on parallel make, Philip Guenther, 2006/12/12
- Re: Improvement on parallel make,
Philip Guenther <=
- Re: Improvement on parallel make, Alexey Neyman, 2006/12/12
- Re: Improvement on parallel make, Philip Guenther, 2006/12/12
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Christophe Lyon, 2006/12/12
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Philip Guenther, 2006/12/12
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Christophe Lyon, 2006/12/12
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Brendan Heading, 2006/12/12
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Christophe Lyon, 2006/12/12
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Brendan Heading, 2006/12/12
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Christophe Lyon, 2006/12/12
Re: Improvement on parallel make, Brendan Heading, 2006/12/12