[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: makedepends and implicit rule
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
RE: makedepends and implicit rule |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:17:13 -0500 |
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 10:22 +0000, sharan basappa wrote:
> >Make has an implicit "%.o : %.c" rule. Look in the make info file,
> >section 10.2 "Catalogue of Implicit Rules".
>
> The question I was asking how make decides to compile even though I
> dont have a rule of the form
> *.o : *.c
> The only rule I have is
> a : a.o
> I believe this rule should force make to invoke linker but make also invokes
> compiler (cc -c -o b.o b.c)
Sure it invokes the compiler: how else can you get the .o you need to
link?
Dave already gave you the answer: make has a number of built-in implicit
rules that tell it how to do various things: building a .o from a .c is
of course one of those built-in rules. So, you don't need to provide an
explicit rule for this (unless you don't like the built-in rule and want
to change it to something else).
As Dave says, the GNU make manual has a list of many of the built-in
rules. Use "make -p -f /dev/null" to see an entire list.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist