[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator
From: |
Dave Korn |
Subject: |
RE: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:07:16 -0000 |
On 10 January 2008 13:02, Paul Smith wrote:
Minor misattribution here:
>> You left a blank line between the target and the rules. That acts as
>> a separator,
>
> This is actually not true. You can put as many blank lines as you like
> between the target and the recipe, and between the rules inside a single
> recipe. Blank lines are completely ignored by make. Note that lines
> with nothing but comments and/or space characters are also considered
> blank lines. The only things that can end a rule are another rule, or a
> variable definition.
That was my mistake, not Philip's. Thanks for fixing it!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
- RE: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, (continued)
- RE: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Dave Korn, 2008/01/09
- Re: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Russell King, 2008/01/09
- RE: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Dave Korn, 2008/01/09
- Re: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Russell King, 2008/01/09
- Re: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Philip Guenther, 2008/01/09
- Re: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Russell King, 2008/01/09
- Re: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Philip Guenther, 2008/01/09
- Re: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Russell King, 2008/01/09
- Re: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Philip Guenther, 2008/01/09
- Re: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Paul Smith, 2008/01/10
- RE: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator,
Dave Korn <=
- RE: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Paul Smith, 2008/01/10
- RE: make failing, tabs are fine, missing separator, Dave Korn, 2008/01/10