[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic top-level targets
From: |
Timothy Reilly |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic top-level targets |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:02:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Thursday 12 June 2008 14:44:49 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I'm not sure that the pattern rules will match as you have specified
> above though; you'd probably have to have the ability to do "front" as
> well as "rear" pattern matching. I don't believe that function is
> available in make at all.
It's clear that the pattern matching doesn't work- if it did, I wouldn't be
asking this list. My question is /why/ this isn't working. It's not clear
to me why this fails to work while suffix matching for defining my own
implicit rules works. --v
> Why do that though if you can specify compile options via conditionals
> in make, like ifeq, if, etc, and manipulate the target name via $(if
> ...)? Seems like a simpler solution to the issue...
>
Because I didn't know about $(if ... )
How would one refer to the target before having matched any rules? Does the
builtin $@ get set?
Timothy Reilly
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.