[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Advanced Auto-Dependency Generation and Parallel Execution
From: |
Josh Davidson |
Subject: |
RE: Advanced Auto-Dependency Generation and Parallel Execution |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:53:15 -0700 |
I must be missing something:
sed -e 's/#.*//' -e 's/^[^:]*: *//' -e 's/ *\\$$//' \
-e '/^$$/ d' -e 's/$$/ :/' < $*.d >> $*.P; \
How is the "< $*.d >> $*.P" not redirecting STDIN to $*.d?
Josh
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Smith [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 12:53 PM
To: Josh Davidson
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Advanced Auto-Dependency Generation and Parallel Execution
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 01:17 -0700, Josh Davidson wrote:
> Since sed is reading from STDIN to generate the dependency problem,
> doesn?t it violate the rule above?
sed is not reading from the terminal. It's reading from the output of
the previous command, through the pipe. So, there is no worry here.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.us
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad
Scientist
- RE: Advanced Auto-Dependency Generation and Parallel Execution,
Josh Davidson <=