[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:59:47 -0500 |
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 09:21 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i didn't try it because i was going off what i read in ORA's book on
> make where they explain the value of using the MAKE variable, and it
> mentions nothing about passing that particular option, so i assumed it
> didn't. if it actually does, then that solves the problem.
All options and variables on the original make command line are always
passed to sub-makes by default, except in a few very specific cases
where it doesn't make much sense (things like -o, IIRC).
Definitely -I is passed to sub-makes, though.
Cheers!
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.us
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/07
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/07
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Garrett Cooper, 2008/12/08
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Sam Ravnborg, 2008/12/09
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/09
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Paul Smith, 2008/12/09
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/09
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/09