[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: recipe!!
From: |
Sam Ravnborg |
Subject: |
Re: recipe!! |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:09:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:25:05AM +0430, ali hagigat wrote:
> I wonder why the word 'command' changed with 'recipe' in the make
> manual!! Command was a better word and inspired the real function of
> the shell commands for a rule.
I wonder what manual you refer too.
I quickly searched for all occurrences of "command" in the make manual.
Reading up to and including chapter 5 I found not a single spot where I saw
command was used to refer to a recipe.
And if you really had read the make manual you would see that
chaper five named "Writing recipes in Rules" describes recipes
in a clear way.
Hint: A recipe may contain a command.
> When i look at 'recipe', it takes some seconds to translate it back to
> 'command' to understand it.
Which should give you a good hint you are wrong.
> The word 'command' is still used at some
> parts of the document and it seems that the author did not have time
> to replace the new invention completely.
Please supply a patch to update documentation or specify where it is wrong.
Anything else is just wasted time of the readers of this list.
Sam
- recipe!!, ali hagigat, 2010/09/07
- Re: recipe!!,
Sam Ravnborg <=
- Re: recipe!!, Paul Smith, 2010/09/07
- Re: recipe!!, Sam Ravnborg, 2010/09/07
- Re: recipe!!, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/13
- Re: recipe!!, Sam Ravnborg, 2010/09/13
- Re: recipe!!, Paul Smith, 2010/09/13
- Re: recipe!!, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/13