[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites,
From: |
Mark Galeck (CW) |
Subject: |
RE: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:13:52 -0800 |
Thank you everybody for the advanced discussion from which I learnt a lot.
To answer Eli's question about the usage situation, I had a target which was a
.tar file, and it's prerequisites were symbolic links put in one directory and
pointing to various places.
Even though the filesystem supports sub-second timestamps, the tar utility
making the target did not and half of the time rounds the time backwards to the
nearest second. However, the ln -s command sets up the modify timestamp of the
link to sub-second resolution. And I was using MAKEFLAGS := -LrR so that the
timestamps of the links themselves mattered.
So I would build, .tar file gets created, and then I build again without any
other changes, sometimes gets created again based on the backwards rounding.
As for .LOW_RESOLUTION_TIME, it is a recent feature, I am actually using emake,
mostly compatible with make, but not necessarily yet available or installed by
IT on my server with the latest revision compatibility of GNU Make. Can't use
.LOW_RESOLUTION_TIME yet.
My current solution is to just put sleep 1 when I need it - this problem only
happens in recipes which do not have to be executed fast.
- RE: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Paul Smith, 2011/11/13
- RE: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Mark Galeck (CW), 2011/11/13
- RE: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Paul Smith, 2011/11/14
- RE: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Mark Galeck (CW), 2011/11/14
- RE: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Paul Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/14
- RE: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?,
Mark Galeck (CW) <=
- Re: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, David Boyce, 2011/11/14
- Re: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/14
- Re: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Paul Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, David Boyce, 2011/11/14
- Re: updating target at the end of recipe, after updating prerequisites, might not work?, Paul Smith, 2011/11/14
why would chaining built in implicit rules not work?, Mark Galeck (CW), 2011/11/13