Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

help-make (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Mon Apr 30 2012 20:55:28 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• April 30, 2012
  • Re: make -B and the order-only prerequisites, Philip Guenther, 20:55
  • make -B and the order-only prerequisites, John Gamboa, 18:27
  • Re: Hiding a Make function, Stephan Beal, 17:24
  • Re: Hiding a Make function, Basile Starynkevitch, 17:23
  • Re: Hiding a Make function, AB, 17:01
  • Re: Hiding a Make function, Lane Schwartz, 15:44
  • Hiding a Make function, AB, 15:42
• April 26, 2012
  • Re: I need a help about make, Paul Smith, 00:27
  • I need a help about make, 邓东平, 00:26
• April 24, 2012
  • unexplained behavior in autoconf-style stamp-h/config.h rule, Peter Eisentraut, 15:57
  • Re: UTF-16 Makefile, Paul Smith, 14:51
  • UTF-16 Makefile, Jaison Daniel J, 14:50
• April 21, 2012
  • Re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD), Martin d'Anjou, 23:06
  • Re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD), Paul Smith, 21:38
• April 18, 2012
  • Re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD), Martin d'Anjou, 20:53
  • Re: optional dependencies?, Erik Rull, 17:12
  • optional dependencies?, Paul Wise, 13:49
• April 16, 2012
  • Re: make and remote dependencies, Paul Smith, 10:04
  • Re: make and remote dependencies, Paul Wise, 09:32
  • Re: make and remote dependencies, Paul Smith, 02:10
  • make and remote dependencies, Paul Wise, 01:44
• April 14, 2012
  • Re: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only", Michael Ludwig, 05:52
  • re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD), Martin d'Anjou, 00:20
• April 13, 2012
  • RE: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only", Mark Galeck (CW), 13:14
  • Re: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only", Bryan Ischo, 13:05
  • RE: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only", Mark Galeck (CW), 13:00
  • RE: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only", Mark Galeck (CW), 12:47
  • Re: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only", Paul Smith, 12:41
  • how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only", Mark Galeck (CW), 12:07
  • re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD), Martin d'Anjou, 09:22
• April 12, 2012
  • segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD), Martin d'Anjou, 21:53
  • Re: SECONDEXPANSION and $(shell) bug in make 3.82.90, Martin d'Anjou, 21:38
  • Re: SECONDEXPANSION and $(shell) bug in make 3.82.90, Paul Smith, 17:26
  • SECONDEXPANSION and $(shell) bug in make 3.82.90, Martin d'Anjou, 16:01
  • vagrind report of Make 3.82 segmentation fault with realloc invalid next size, Martin d'Anjou, 14:27
• April 05, 2012
  • Re: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC?, Jeffrey Walton, 19:19
• April 04, 2012
  • RE: Avoid generation of include files when doing "make clean", Warlich, Christof, 07:13
  • Re: Avoid generation of include files when doing "make clean", Stephan Beal, 06:31
  • Avoid generation of include files when doing "make clean", Warlich, Christof, 06:20
• April 03, 2012
  • RE: under the explained algorithm of re-reading timestamps, how to deal with this common situation?, Mark Galeck (CW), 09:34
  • Re: under the explained algorithm of re-reading timestamps, how to deal with this common situation?, Lane Schwartz, 09:31
  • RE: under the explained algorithm of re-reading timestamps, how to deal with this common situation?, Mark Galeck (CW), 09:31
  • under the explained algorithm of re-reading timestamps, how to deal with this common situation?, Mark Galeck (CW), 09:24
• April 02, 2012
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Michael Ludwig, 14:08
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Michael Ludwig, 13:54
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Michael Ludwig, 13:32
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 11:47
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 11:33
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 11:27
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, david . hagood, 10:36
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Lane Schwartz, 10:28
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Paul Smith, 10:20
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Paul Smith, 10:09
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Lane Schwartz, 09:58
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 08:55
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 08:48
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 08:44
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 08:42
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Paul Smith, 08:38
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Paul Smith, 08:24
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 08:21
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 08:01
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Paul Smith, 07:53
  • Re: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC?, Bryan Ischo, 03:09
  • this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target, Mark Galeck (CW), 02:37
  • RE: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC?, John Calcote, 02:10
• April 01, 2012
  • Re: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC?, Bryan Ischo, 19:18
  • CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC?, Jeffrey Walton, 14:30

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc