[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Exported vs command line variables
From: |
Rakesh Sharma |
Subject: |
Re: Exported vs command line variables |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2016 04:34:42 +0000 |
There is no difference between the two. They both declare environment variables
for make.
________________________________
From: Help-make <address@hidden> on behalf of Pietro <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 9:32 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Exported vs command line variables
Hi,
I have noticed that there is a difference between the two scenarios
listed below:
i) make CC=arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc CPPFLAGS=[..]
ii) export CPPFLAGS=[..] [RET]
make CC=arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
I have read over internet that the latter is used when appending
instead of replacing/setting the variable's value.
What is exactly the difference ? Is there a page in the Make manual
explaining that ?
Thanks a lot,
P.
_______________________________________________
Help-make mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
Help-make -- Users list for the GNU implementation of
make<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make>
lists.gnu.org
Help-make -- Users list for the GNU implementation of make About Help-make
- Exported vs command line variables, Pietro, 2016/09/19
- Re: Exported vs command line variables,
Rakesh Sharma <=
- AW: Exported vs command line variables, Warlich, Christof, 2016/09/20
- Re: AW: Exported vs command line variables, Pietro, 2016/09/20
- AW: AW: Exported vs command line variables, Warlich, Christof, 2016/09/20
- Re: AW: AW: Exported vs command line variables, Pietro, 2016/09/20
- AW: AW: AW: Exported vs command line variables, Warlich, Christof, 2016/09/21
Re: Exported vs command line variables, Brian Vandenberg, 2016/09/20