[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FEATURE:? binding variables to prerequisites
From: |
Cook, Malcolm |
Subject: |
FEATURE:? binding variables to prerequisites |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:18:44 +0000 |
Hi Paul et. al.,
When a rule has multiple prerequisites I sometimes use make variables to refer
to them positionally, like this:
^1=$(word 1,$^)
^2=$(word 2,$^)
^3=$(word 3,$^)
^2..=$(wordlist 2,$(words $^),$^)
^3..=$(wordlist 3,$(words $^),$^)
%.foo: %.bar %.baz %.bat1 %.bat2 %.bat3
process --baz ${^2}--bar ${^1} --bat ${^3..} > $@
What do you think of such syntactic sugar?
Is there any sweeter version?
Is there some way to bind pattern specific variables to prerequisite using some
syntax allowing rules such as:
%.foo: a:=%.bar b:=%.baz c:=%.bat1 %.bat2 %.bat3
process --baz ${b}--bar ${a} --bat ${c} > $@
Might this be candidate for a new feature request? Are there any other similar
such ideas percolating?
FWIW - I mainly use make to structure bioinformatics analysis pipelines.
Cheers,
Malcolm Cook
Manager, Database Applications
Big Data AI and GenomicsĀ
Stowers Institute for Medical Research
- FEATURE:? binding variables to prerequisites,
Cook, Malcolm <=