[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2
From: |
Brian Cowan |
Subject: |
RE: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 |
Date: |
Thu, 5 May 2022 18:18:47 +0000 |
Unless you have specified -k, a non-zero result from executing the build script
will cause make to terminate with a non-zero return code. If you use -k, I
would expect a non-zero return code from make even after the make continues. It
seems to do that in my rather stilted test… I’m not sure of the utility of -k,
but I have seen environments where *a* component would fail in the first pass
of a -k build, and then complete successfully in a second -k build. Sometimes
it's faster to just run the build 2x than to chase down what's happening in the
build dependencies...
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Juan Pablo Garibotti Arias, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Kaz Kylheku, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Paul Smith, 2022/05/05
- RE: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Brian Cowan, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/05
- RE: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2,
Brian Cowan <=
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Paul Smith, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Kaz Kylheku, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/05
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/20
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Paul Smith, 2022/05/21
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/21
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/22
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Paul Smith, 2022/05/22
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2022/05/22