[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Conditional broken line in recipe
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Conditional broken line in recipe |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Sep 2023 22:09:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.48.4 (by Flathub.org) |
On Sun, 2023-09-03 at 01:03 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> I was also wondering... is ONESHELL significant for performance?
> Does the reduction in number of shells speed up things?
It might increase performance but that's not what it's for primarily,
at least not in my opinion. It's there for people who want to use
shells other than POSIX sh as their SHELL value, where it's not so easy
to create an entire script on a single line and using backslashes.
--
Paul D. Smith <psmith@gnu.org> Find some GNU make tips at:
https://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad
Scientist
Re: Conditional broken line in recipe, Paul Smith, 2023/09/02
Re: Conditional broken line in recipe, Bahman Movaqar, 2023/09/03