RE: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX

[Jay]

Chris, It is still skipping the new code.
config.log:
 
 
configure:6645: checking for GNU-style word boundary regex support
configure:6682: gcc -o conftest -g -O2   conftest.c  >&5
configure:6685: $? = 0
configure:6691: ./conftest
configure:6694: $? = 1
configure: program exited with status 1
configure: failed program was:
..
.. no line numbers reported in here..
..
configure:6709: result: no
configure:6842: checking whether to enable UTF-8 support
configure:6855: result: auto
configure:6858: checking whether to use slang
configure:7749: result: no
configure:7843: checking for getdelim
configure:7899: gcc -o conftest -g -O2   conftest.c  >&5
ld: Unsatisfied symbol "getdelim" in file /var/tmp//ccocXNPa.o
 

The XOPEN code is around like 6716.
 
Maybe soon I'll have the right versions of perl/autoconf/etc. and can try myself.

 - Jay
 
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:53:32 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden
>
> Are you saying it bails out, or the code I added just doesn't execute?
> If it's the latter it's just due to me leaving out a $. I created a
> new tarball at
> http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/test/nano-2.1.9-svn-xopenchk2.tar.gz,
> please give it a go at your leisure.
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jay <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Trying again, without the attachments.
> >
> > - Jay
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: address@hidden
> > To: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > Subject: RE: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
> > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:37:18 +0000
> >
> > Hi Chris, it doesn't work.
> > The relevant code in configure doesn't run.
> >
> > config.log:
> >
> > |
> > | if (regcomp(&r, "\\>", REG_EXTENDED|REG_NOSUB))
> > | return 1;
> > | if (regexec(&r, "word boundary", nmatch, &pmatch, 0))
> > | return 1;
> > | return 0;
> > | }
> > configure:6709: result: no
> > configure:6842: checking whether to enable UTF-8 support
> > configure:6855: result: auto
> > configure:6858: checking whether to use slang
> > configure:7749: result: no
> > configure:7843: checking for getdelim
> > configure:7899: gcc -o conftest -O2 conftest.c >&5
> > ld: Unsatisfied symbol "getdelim" in file /var/tmp//ccofn2wV.o
> > 1 errors.
> >
> >
> > Your code is around line 6716.
> >
> >
> > Attached config.log and config.h.
> >
> > - Jay
> >
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:56:42 -0500
> >> Subject: Re: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
> >> From: address@hidden
> >> To: address@hidden
> >> CC: address@hidden
> >>
> >> Hi Jay,
> >>
> >> I would rather just put feature-specific checks in configure.ac
> >> whenever possible. I took a crack at this, can you try the tarball at
> >> http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/test/nano-2.1.9-svn-xopenchk.tar.gz
> >> and let me know whether it works for you? Thanks much.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Jay <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > Chris, no problem, no rush. It is working for me.
> >> > tarball or svn should be ok.
> >> > (I've never used command line svn, but have used cvs, so... and I don't
> >> > have
> >> > svn on this machine yet, but can always go through another..)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > If you are worried about:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > fips_rand.c:59:1: warning: "_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED" redefined
> >> > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1026&user=guest&pass=guest
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You can either do
> >> > #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> >> > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> >> > Are there values other than 1?
> >> > Like defining it to a date/version-thing?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > or #ifndef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> >> > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> >> > #endif
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > but having configure only #define it if it "helps" is also reasonable.
> >> > Maybe there are other problems.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Another thing you can do, a little icky maybe, but maybe nicer than
> >> > adding
> >> > configurey :)
> >> > is isolating the code that needs it so as to minimize the risk. You
> >> > know,
> >> > little wrapper functions and extern consts, with some alternate names,
> >> > that
> >> > just wrap the "real" stuff.
> >> > Perhaps that's not the best source organization though.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > stdarg.h you can either put in unconditionally, should be safe.
> >> > This system has a K&R compiler but I think still has stdarg.h.
> >> > As well, it need only go in under the same situation -- tied to the use
> >> > of
> >> > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > SIMILARY, I had some source yesterday (not nano, not HP-UX) that
> >> > required
> >> > #define _GNU_SOURCE or such.
> >> > g++ predefined it, gcc did not. So I had to do that #undef to fix that
> >> > very
> >> > same warning.
> >> > It was C code but I like to check that it compiles as C++ too.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > - Jay
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:44:07 -0500
> >> >> Subject: Re: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
> >> >> From: address@hidden
> >> >> To: address@hidden
> >> >> CC: address@hidden
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Jay,
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for this report. Unfortunately, from what i read about
> >> >> _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED it sounds like it may change other behaviors as
> >> >> well by defining it. I think I will have to add a check to the
> >> >> configure script to test whether the colors are available without
> >> >> defining _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED, and then try it with the flag and set
> >> >> it properly if needed, and then if needed define it. This will
> >> >> probably take a day or two, but are you willing to test out a tarball
> >> >> if I create one for you, or do you have subversion access?
> >> >>
> >> >> The stdarg stuff should be easy to check for as well via configure.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Jay <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The include is of stdarg.h with angle brackets.
> >> >> > My email is getting munged, sorry.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > - Jay
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ----------------------------------------
> >> >> >> From: address@hidden
> >> >> >> To: address@hidden
> >> >> >> Subject: FW: compiling nano on HP-UX
> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:34:44 +0000
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> [bounced there]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> From: jay.krell@
> >> >> >> To: nano-devel@
> >> >> >> Subject: compiling nano on HP-UX
> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:20:58 +0000
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> nano-2.1.9
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -bash-3.2$ gcc -v
> >> >> >> Reading specs from
> >> >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/3.3.6/specs
> >> >> >> Configured with: /src/gcc-3.3.6/configure -verbose
> >> >> >> -with-as=/usr/local/bin/gas -with-gnu-as
> >> >> >> Thread model: single
> >> >> >> gcc version 3.3.6
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -bash-3.2$ uname -a
> >> >> >> HP-UX jkhpux1 B.11.11 U 9000/800 1595760578 unlimited-user license
> >> >> >> This is I think "11v1".
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> color.c: In function `color_init':
> >> >> >> color.c:86: error: `COLOR_WHITE' undeclared (first use in this
> >> >> >> function)
> >> >> >> color.c:86: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> >> >> >> color.c:86: error: for each function it appears in.)
> >> >> >> color.c:93: error: `COLOR_BLACK' undeclared (first use in this
> >> >> >> function)
> >> >> >> gmake: *** [color.o] Error 1
> >> >> >> -bash-3.2$ pwd
> >> >> >> /src/nano-2.1.9/src
> >> >> >> -bash-3.2$ cp color.c color.c.orig
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> put #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED at the top of color.c
> >> >> >> =>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/3.3.6/include/curses.h:755:
> >> >> >> error: syntax error
> >> >> >> before "va_list"
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> put #include at the top of color.c
> >> >> >> => works
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I don't have GNU diff yet:
> >> >> >> -bash-3.2$ diff color.c.orig color.c
> >> >> >> 23a24,25
> >> >> >>> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> >> >> >>> #include
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Either order compiles, but this seems better.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> rcfile.c: In function `color_to_short':
> >> >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: `COLOR_GREEN' undeclared (first use in this
> >> >> >> function)
> >> >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> >> >> >> once
> >> >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: for each function it appears in.)
> >> >> >> rcfile.c:545: error: `COLOR_RED' undeclared (first use in this
> >> >> >> function)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> same thing.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -bash-3.2$ diff rcfile.c.orig rcfile.c
> >> >> >> 23a24,25
> >> >> >>> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> >> >> >>> #include
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> and then it builds and works.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> - Jay
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Help-nano mailing list
> >> >> > address@hidden
> >> >> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-nano
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Help-nano mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-nano
> >
> >