[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: editor for Octave
From: |
Christoph Dalitz |
Subject: |
Re: editor for Octave |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:10:04 +0100 |
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:57:16 -0800
"robert Macy" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Sc1
> Version 1.57
> by Neil Hodgson.
> December 1998-November 2003.
> http://www.scintilla.org
>
> Don't know if it runs on Linux, though.
>
Sure it does. You should use at least version 1.58 because it has
better Octave syntax highlighting support.
You should add a symlink to the scite editor in /usr/local/bin,
because the executable has an immemorable spelling, "ScItE" or
"SCitE" or something similar (I have forgotten the actual spelling).
Hugo Coolens <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Which editor is recommended for use with Octave on a Linux system?
> (is syntaxhighlighting possible with it?)
>
One of the most versatile editors is Emacs. It has builtin support
for Octave: beside syntax highlighting it is even possible to send
the editor contents to an octave subprocess in a different window.
There exist two flavors of emacs: "Gnu Emacs" and "Xemacs". I would
recommend "GNU Emacs" because many macro packages do not work with
"Xemacs" (e.g. CUA mode).
If you are used to other editors, you should install the CUA-mode
from http://www.cua.dk/, which activates the usual keaboard shortcuts
for mark/cut/copy/paste.
Christoph Dalitz
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: More on binary packages and FFTW/ATLAS, (continued)
- Re: More on binary packages and FFTW/ATLAS, Paul Kienzle, 2004/02/20
- Re: More on binary packages and FFTW/ATLAS, Quentin Spencer, 2004/02/20
- Re: More on binary packages and FFTW/ATLAS, Dirk Eddelbuettel, 2004/02/20
- Re: More on binary packages and FFTW/ATLAS, Paul Kienzle, 2004/02/21
- Re: More on binary packages and FFTW/ATLAS, John W. Eaton, 2004/02/25
- editor for Octave, Hugo Coolens, 2004/02/21
- Re: editor for Octave, Willem Atsma, 2004/02/21
- Re: editor for Octave, robert Macy, 2004/02/21
- Re: editor for Octave,
Christoph Dalitz <=
- Re: editor for Octave xemacs - cua, Joerg Schreiber, 2004/02/23
- Re: editor for Octave scite- german version, Joerg Schreiber, 2004/02/23
RE: binary packages, THOMAS Paul Richard, 2004/02/16