[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is the best approach - 'sqp' or 'fsolve' ?
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: What is the best approach - 'sqp' or 'fsolve' ? |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:13:15 +0100 |
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Guido Walter Pettinari
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Jaroslev,
>
> thank you for your answer!
>
> Since I have to minimize just one function - not a system - and I have no
> constraints, I guess I am better off with 'fminunc'. I am using Octave 3.2.3;
> do you deem the 'fminunc' included there is robust enough?
>
I can't tell - you'll have to try it. In any case, there have been
some significant fixes and improvements since 3.2.3.
> I would like to ask you one more question about optimization. Which 'fzero'
> function would you recommend, the one in Octave core or the one in the
> optimization package?
I recommend the core one, but I'm biased because I wrote it :)
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek, PhD
computing expert & GNU Octave developer
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz