[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:43:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) |
> What about +/- for class/instance method like Objective-C? I think your
> example is rather complex for defining class/instance method. For other
> parts I actually does not have good/bad points.
If I head written #new as an instance method, for example, I think
Stefan (or somebody else for him) could have spotted the problem
with this syntax. I find instead very confusing to remember which
of +/- is a class and which is an instance method.
Also, UML has hijacked +/- for public/private respectively, which
can only add to the confusion.
Paolo
- [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Stefan Schmiedl, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Sungjin Chun, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, parasti, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, parasti, 2007/03/10
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Mike Anderson, 2007/03/11
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, parasti, 2007/03/11