[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:18:28 +0000 |
As discussed,
smalltalk--backstage--2.2--patch-70
optionalize JSON outputEncoding
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:26 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Whats the magic behind 8?
>
> Greater than 0. :-)
I picked the growCollection size for a WriteStream collection of size 0,
which is what was originally produced.
Speaking of which:
WriteStream class extend [
onSpecies: aSpecies [
^self on: (aSpecies new: 8)
]
]
? Since collection species needs to support #new: anyway....
--
Our last-ditch plan is to change the forums into a podcast, then send
RSS feeds into the blogosphere so our users can further debate the
legality of mashups amongst this month's 20 'sexiest' gadgets.
--Richard "Lowtax" Kyanka
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Robin Redeker, 2007/11/03
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Stephen Compall, 2007/11/03
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Robin Redeker, 2007/11/03
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Stephen Compall, 2007/11/03
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Robin Redeker, 2007/11/04
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Stephen Compall, 2007/11/04
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Robin Redeker, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser,
Stephen Compall <=
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] performance of the json parser, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/11/05