[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves un
From: |
Van L |
Subject: |
Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jun 2019 17:57:20 +1000 |
> On 6 Jun 2019, at 16:30, Robert Weiner <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Try commenting out the second line in hpath:is-p, namely:
> (setq path (hpath:mswindows-to-posix path))
> and see if that changes anything.
No, the change didn't have the desired effect.
Action Key on the midline breaks the line and creates a new bullet item.
> Otherwise, use edebug to step through the function and see where it decides
> that the path is not valid since I can't duplicate your setup very easily.
I will need to figure out how to use the edebug.
> Certainly we should be able to recognize it as valid once it is mounted. The
> path is probably getting changed somewhere and then showing up as invalid.
The thing is, C-x f, once given '/i/src' and tab-keyed, it is able to generate
a *Completions* buffer by looking ahead along the path. Maybe how the mount is
being done isn't to blame.
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/03
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Van L, 2019/06/04
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/05
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Van L, 2019/06/05
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/05
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Van L, 2019/06/06
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/05
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Van L, 2019/06/06
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/06
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly,
Van L <=
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Van L, 2019/06/06
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/06
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/06
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Van L, 2019/06/07
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/07
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Van L, 2019/06/07
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, VanL, 2019/06/19
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Robert Weiner, 2019/06/19
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, VanL, 2019/06/19
- Re: [Hyperbole-users] Action Key on [FSF 19] at "DEMO:807:44" behaves unexpectedly, Mats Lidell, 2019/06/21