|
From: | Clara Sharp |
Subject: | [Info-chinese] infertile |
Date: | Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:54:44 +0300 |
Why are our scientists so slowto admit the
possibility that we survive death?
As he goes on he reminds us of Intentions andDe
Profundis.
The fact, however, isthat poor Oscar forced his
company on Mr. As he goes on he reminds us of Intentions andDe Profundis. Granting
that we have amass of evidence before us, how should we deal with it?
A few cases teach usnothing and prove as little.
Wilde must, of necessity, feel Moore dim; their mediums ofexpression are far apart.
The next time we sat Wilde was determined to let fly at something.
Why are our scientists so slowto admit the
possibility that we survive death?
The note of a colossal egotism is prominentin all
these scripts, it never varies.
His wit is tarnished since he passed
over.
He finds it difficult to enter intothe present
time. I liked her, andmore especially her intonation. It would be futile tospeculate
as to how or why he discovered us.
I feel that the right note has not beenstruck
here.
Do we then expectour shades to smarten up in the
Beyond? We have three separate proofs in this script of the identityof our
communicator.
A sad little effort this, to revive thefeelings of
a different age. He regards his present state as in some ways inconvenient
andamusing.
Worthing to step up to me and listen to
mycriticisms of his performance. Iwither because my thoughts are broken on the
stem.
Proof of survival varies with the minds of
individuals. Really this script cannot be described as the work of a drearyghost.
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |