[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[OT] bug tracking systems
From: |
schmolle |
Subject: |
[OT] bug tracking systems |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:42:59 +0000 |
Hi list,
>[Robert Pollak] 'bug tracking system that provides some of bugzilla's
>functionality' __ What I like most about bugzilla is the ability to attach
>files (patches, test examples, log files) to a bug entry.
A tip I would like to share:
At my company, we use Rational ClearQuest for one of our clients (avoid the
tool; you can hire a whole developer for a year for what it costs) and we had
an issue with a client logging bugs that would -- for good measure -- have to
include log files. The problem was that those files can easily balloon into
150MB / day.
Also, there might be multiple bugs that would each require said logs for
reference and diagnosis. At 150MB a pop, it makes sense to not duplicate them.
We decided on an the solution that the client would post the logs daily to a
shared FTP server, where they can be referenced from within ClearQuest. (by
name / number, nothing fancy).
>GNATS
The last thing I heard from the GNAT-annouce list is that it's maintainers are
not maintaining it anymore. Unless that has changed, the project is as good as
dead.
TTYL,
Schmolle
- [OT] bug tracking systems,
schmolle <=