[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future CVS Development
From: |
Mike Castle |
Subject: |
Re: Future CVS Development |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:25:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 04:20:03PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Tuesday, June 19, 2001 at 15:14:37 (-0400), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> > What about files with textual content like Word files?
>
> If it works well with unix diff and diff3 (and patch or rcsmerge), then
> it'll work well with CVS. Of course if the application makes arbitrary
> or unnecessary changes then it will work a lot less well regardless of
> how well any two revisions can be diffed.
Heh.
Branch off, decided to use indent(1) on a bunch of .c files, and then do a
merge.
Or tidy on html.
Or fmt on readme.txt, .tex{,i}, or roff files.
It's not pretty.
mrc
--
Mike Castle address@hidden www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
- RE: Future CVS Development, (continued)
- RE: Future CVS Development, Thornley, David, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Thornley, David, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Kostur, Andre, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19