[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Branch removal and nested branches
From: |
Donald Sharp |
Subject: |
Re: Branch removal and nested branches |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:59:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.4i |
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:24:58PM -0400, Donald Sharp wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:19:56PM -0400, Larry Jones wrote:
> > Donald Sharp writes:
> > >
> > > Also, Removing the branch with tag -d doesn't really remove the data,
> > > it only removes the branch name from the symbols section of the
> > > ,v file. You can put yourself in situations where you create
> > > a new branch( and it reuses the old branch number ), and
> > > then all of a sudden that new branch has a lot of versions on it.
> >
> > No, CVS is smarter than that. When deciding what revision numbers to
> > use for a new branch, it looks at the existing revisions, not just the
> > tags.
>
> urmmm... That's not been my experience.
>
> Here's my experience:
>
> user deletes a branch with tag -d
>
> user creates a new branch, and cvs used the same branch number.
>
> Let me go back and see if I can find more information for you...
> Or if I am smoking too much of my daily alotment of crack.
I went back and checked. I accidently smoked too much of my
daily alotment ;)
Larry's right( as usual )
donald
>
> donald
>
> >
> > -Larry Jones
> >
> > When you're SERIOUS about having fun, it's not much fun at all! -- Calvin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Info-cvs mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs