[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: refactoring when using CVS
From: |
Noel Yap |
Subject: |
RE: refactoring when using CVS |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:59:06 -0800 (PST) |
--- "Thornley, David" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > From: Noel Yap [mailto:address@hidden
> > There you have it, yet another space where CVS
> isn't
> > ideal: XP.
> >
> No, XP in Java. The original XP people used
> Smalltalk,
> a dynamic object-oriented language, and I'd think
> that
> XP would work best when using a dynamic
> object-oriented
> language such as Smalltalk and Common Lisp. Doing a
> quick Google search shows that people are talking
> about
> XP in Java, and selling stuff to support it, but
> that
> doesn't mean it's a good idea.
AFAIK, XP promotes "Refactor early, refactor often."
If so, and given Greg's premise that refactorisation
should be rare and well-thought-out, then CVS isn't
good for within an XP environment.
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Kaz Kylheku, 2002/02/20
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Thornley, David, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS,
Noel Yap <=
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/23
- Message not available
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Tom Plunket, 2002/02/21
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/21