Re: CVS Update Behaviour

[Paul Sander]

>--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden

>[ On Tuesday, February 26, 2002 at 23:51:29 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour

>>  Yes, some of the tools I listed are nearly worthless (or at
>> least have better alternatives).  And in my world, "patch" also falls
>> into that category.  (I don't know why Greg seems to have a problem with
>> this fact.)

>I have no problem with the fact you consider 'patch' to be useless for
>your needs.  I do have a very major problem with the fact that you don't
>have any alternative that's better for your needs.  This is clearly why
>you've had so much problems with file renames.  Clearly you should be
>using 'patch' (or desparately trying to find something equally capable)
>because it solves problems you've apparently left un-solved and which
>you've continually whined and moaned about in this forum for literally
>years now.

I use the "merge" program, which is way better for my needs.

>--- End of forwarded message from address@hidden