[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC - new switches for 'cvs status'
From: |
Matthew Persico |
Subject: |
Re: RFC - new switches for 'cvs status' |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:03:58 -0400 |
Sorry to be replying sooooo far AFTER the original thread, but the job
really caught up to me.
I will post the Perl here, as Arcin Bozkurt - Archie <address@hidden>
suggested. (Is posting scripts/code allowed? Should it be in-line or as
attachments?). Let everyone throw arrows at it. :-)
Should I/we decide to patch the CVS source, who do we contact to get
official sanction? I do not want to patch only to have someone say "Nice,
but it doesn't pass these rules for coding" or "we are going to use the -i
switch later on, please change it...". I'd like to know all that up front.
Matthew
--
If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it 'code'