[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sync repositories
From: |
Paul Sander |
Subject: |
Re: sync repositories |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:02:05 -0700 |
>--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden
>On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:50:06PM -0700, Paul Sander wrote:
>> Each site owns its own trunk. Each site creates a branch that is used for
>> importing from the other site(s); these branches map to the trunk(s) at the
>> remote site(s). No local commits are permitted on the import branches.
>> Each site keeps a list of branches to export to the other site(s), and
>> tracks the latest exported versions on each export branch.
>Interesting approach. With some scripting, it could actually
>work...
Of course it will work. You have no faith! ;-)
>Geez, it sounds like a CVS-based (partial) implementation of your
>old EMFS thingie :-)
This design is way better than EMFS, actually. It keeps the original
changes at each site on separate branches, so they're easier track and
isolate if necessary. EMFS allows the definitive sources to get out of
synch with the remote copies, which can't happen with a versioning system
(provided the branch mastership conventions are enforced strictly).
>--- End of forwarded message from address@hidden
- sync repositories, Piet Verhoeve, 2002/08/08
- Re: sync repositories, Zieg, Mark, 2002/08/09
- RE: sync repositories, Zieg, Mark, 2002/08/09
- Re: sync repositories, Eric Siegerman, 2002/08/19
- Re: sync repositories, Paul Sander, 2002/08/19
- Re: sync repositories, Eric Siegerman, 2002/08/19
Re: sync repositories, Mike Ayers, 2002/08/09