[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tag locking change
From: |
Paul Sander |
Subject: |
Re: Tag locking change |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:11:42 -0700 |
>--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden
>Mark writes:
>>
>> If one wants to tag the latest on a branch, why should one have to create a
>> workarea to do it?
>How do you know you want to tag the latest on a branch? Either you have
>no idea what the "latest" actually is, or you know that no one is going
>to be trying to commit changes while you're tagging the files. In
>neither case is directory-at-a-time locking going to make any difference.
Most of the time it's the former. But you do know what was "latest at
a given time". And "a given time" could possibly be "now". Given this,
everything becomes pretty well-defined and rtag can run with or without
two-phase locking. There is one exception: The branch tag moves during
the rtag.
I can envision someone using a floating branch tag to identify the
approved branch for the next release, but I have not yet heard of anyone
actually doing that. So using a branch tag/timestamp pair is very
likely to be safe. But if you want to avoid the floating branch tag
situation then two-phase locking is still required.
>--- End of forwarded message from address@hidden
- Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/06
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/06
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Eric Siegerman, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Mark, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change,
Paul Sander <=
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Mike Ayers, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09