[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Per-modules readers/writers ?
From: |
david |
Subject: |
Re: Per-modules readers/writers ? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:14:42 -0600 (CST) |
> Todd Denniston writes:
>
> > This is the point where you set down, add up what it
> > will cost your company to support your number of users
> > by putting addons on a ''cheapskates'' version control
> > system to support its use in the companies IP policy setup.
>
For rational values of "company", of course.
> Just asking all these idiotic questions because no one is addressing
> that point. All I'm seeing are comments along the lines of "if your
> company VPs cannot all take time to sit down and do a top-down
> reorganization of your IT department to take advantage of CVS as it
> stands in its purity today, just go away and don't bother us".
>
FWIW, Open Source/Free software is not generally known for providing
features to cater to pointy-haired bosses and their policies, or
anything that is seen as PHB-created messes.
--
Now building a CVS reference site at http://www.thornleyware.com
address@hidden
- Re: Per-modules readers/writers ?, (continued)
- Re: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Todd Denniston, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Shankar Unni, 2002/10/29
- Re: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Larry Jones, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Shankar Unni, 2002/10/29
- Diffing reformatted code, Eric Siegerman, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Shankar Unni, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Paul Sander, 2002/10/29
- Re: Per-modules readers/writers ?,
david <=
RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Zieg, Mark, 2002/10/24