[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multilevel vendor branch import
From: |
Rodolfo Schulz de Lima |
Subject: |
Re: Multilevel vendor branch import |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:20:51 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:52:19AM -0800, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> CVS is a more mature product and needs to move a bit more conservatively
> oriented when considering large changes in how it works. I suspect there
> will be a place for cvs even after svn 1.0 is released.
I know, it's easy to turn a mature, useful and complicated project like
cvs in a complete mess. Except for some exoteric uses, CVS fits the bill
of 95% of our versioning needs, and I've been using it for 2 years know
without major complains. Those 5% missing is due to the lack of
copy/move/rename changes in a repository (at least in my opinion). Maybe
some way of recording, alongside with the diffs, the file name of a
revision, I don't know. RCS doesn't give us the flexibility needed :(
Rodolfo Lima.
Re: Multilevel vendor branch import, Ross Patterson, 2003/10/28
- more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), Richard Pfeiffer, 2003/10/28
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/28
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least, Larry Jones, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), Tom Copeland, 2003/10/29
- Thx!, Richard Pfeiffer, 2003/10/29
Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least, Larry Jones, 2003/10/29