[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head
From: |
Carucci, Jason |
Subject: |
RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???) |
Date: |
Thu, 20 May 2004 10:59:25 -0400 |
WinCVS has a Graph feature that will paint this exact picture for them.
It's a great tool that I use all the time. http://www.wincvs.org/
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of
address@hidden
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:25 AM
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a
branch head???)
"A picture paints a thousand words" (David Gates of Bread)
Because of my CVS experience, AND the help from you folks, I understand
now WHY CVS does its branching. But I have to explain this to my users,
and some of them are a lot less experienced than I am with the tool. So
when they're looking at a GUI tool like tkCVS and don't see "physially"
see that branchY does branch from branchX like I told them it does,
it's hard for me to explain say "Well it does!" Some of these folks are
from Missouri so they say "Show me!" and a picture would be the perfect
answer to this, regardless of version numbers.
-chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Jones [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:57 PM
To: Fouts Christopher ()
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a
branch head???)
address@hidden writes:
>
> It's just when I branch I want to see the "physical" branch,
> regardless where it's coming from.
Why? The process you describe will work just fine with CVS. In fact,
it's a fairly popular process. Just ignore the actual revision numbers
(which you should be doing anyway) and everything will be fine.
-Larry Jones
Wheeee. -- Calvin
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/19
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/20
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/20
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/20
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???),
Carucci, Jason <=
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/20
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Carucci, Jason, 2004/05/20