[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Versioning modules instead of files?
From: |
Todd Denniston |
Subject: |
Re: Versioning modules instead of files? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:28:49 -0500 |
Matthias Kaeppler wrote:
>
> Sergei Organov wrote:
> > Matthias Kaeppler <address@hidden> writes:
<SNIP>
> >>It would be a lot better, if the versioning would happen on the module base,
> >>i.e. you can commit the content of your sandbox as a new version of your
> >>program rather than new versions of the individual files.
> >>
> >>
> >>Is that possible somehow? I can't find any means at all in the documentation
> >>to keep track and control the /program/ version instead of the individual
> >>source file revisions.
> >
> >
> > "cvs tag" is your friend:
> >
> > <quote manual>
<SNIP>
> > </quote manual>
> Ah okay, thanks for pointing me to the right direction.
> I'll read up on tagging and come back if I have further questions.
In anticipation of what I expect your next question to be:
CVS keeps the checkin logs with each individual file, how do I get a log
that shows a coherent picture of each checkin?
Please see cvs2cl:
http://www.red-bean.com/cvs2cl/
There may be other tools to do it, but this one is my favorite.
--
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter