[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: undesirable cvs behavior?
From: |
Rahul |
Subject: |
Re: undesirable cvs behavior? |
Date: |
27 Jun 2005 11:16:56 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/0.2 |
Hi Greg -
There is a better way to do this. We have designed
the WANdisco CVS Replicator for extreme fault tolerance.
Using our solution you create active/active replicas
that can be failed over with zero data-loss instantly.
CVS hosting companies like CVSdude (http://www.cvsdude.org)
are adopting our solution to offer High Availability (HA)
for CVS repositories. Since the replicas are all equal (no
master/slave)
anyone of them can field a request in case there is network or node
failure at a site. So no issues like
missing updates when you switchback from secondary to primary.
To learn more you can visit http://www.wandisco.com/cvs
Regards,
-
Rahul Bhargava,
CTO, WANdisco
Mountain View, CA
http://www.wandisco.com/cvs
Gregory N. Olszewski wrote:
> We have a situation where we may have to quickly failover to a mirror
> which may be missing 5-10 minutes of data. In that case, it would be
> impractical to ensure that every engineer knows that they may lose data
> if they update.....
> ....
> 3. Does anyone know of a better way to accomplish this?