[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS and unicode
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: CVS and unicode |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:02:43 -0400 (EDT) |
Pierre Asselin writes:
>
> It would be nice if CVS decoupled keyword expansion, text/binary,
> mergeability and line-ending conversion independently of one another.
Yes, it would.
> Right now they are all conflated in the RCS "expand" string and
> only a few combinations are supported. The RCS file syntax allows
> arbitrary strings there so it would be possible to extend the
> behavior but that might break compatibility with the RCS utilities
> (which I regard as a bad idea).
Aye, there's the rub. If anyone has any good ideas (and, preferably,
code) to do the former without the latter, please share!
-Larry Jones
I've got an idea for a sit-com called "Father Knows Zilch." -- Calvin
- Re: CVS and unicode, (continued)
- Re: CVS and unicode, Spiro Trikaliotis, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode, Jim Hyslop, 2005/09/12
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/12
- Re: CVS and unicode, Jim Hyslop, 2005/09/12
- Message not available
- Re: CVS and unicode, Pierre Asselin, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: CVS and unicode, Derek Price, 2005/09/12
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/12
RE: CVS and unicode, Arthur Barrett, 2005/09/05
RE: CVS and unicode, Arthur Barrett, 2005/09/06
RE: CVS and unicode, Arthur Barrett, 2005/09/07
Re: CVS and unicode, ai26, 2005/09/10