[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:49:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, kai@emptydomain.de wrote:
> Well, one thing is that you can edit nnml articles but not nnimap
> articles. (That's because IMAP does not provide for a way to edit
> articles.) But it is a really weak reason.
I find editing of articles to be very handy for keeping quick notes.
Also, editing nnimap articles should be possible - there's nothing
particularly hard about retrieving the article, deleting the old
version, and storing a new one. It's just not done right now.
Ted
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, (continued)
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/26
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Simon Josefsson, 2004/07/26
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/27
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Simon Josefsson, 2004/07/27
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/27
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/07/16
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/16
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/07/19
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/20
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/17
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP,
Ted Zlatanov <=
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Steven E. Harris, 2004/07/16
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Andrew A. Raines, 2004/07/21
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/15
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Josh Huber, 2004/07/15