[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP
From: |
Marcus Frings |
Subject: |
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:09:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) |
* Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> wrote:
> Do (setq imap-log t) and wait an hour, or enough to get a fair amount
> of data, and look at the lines starting with '* FLAGS', e.g.:
> * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)
> If some of them contain SPC anywhere except between two flags, then it
> is still buggy. Compare the reported buggy sample:
> ( \Noinferior)
Okay, here is the log (from the time of your posting up to now):
,----[ xenon% grep FLAGS /tmp/log.txt ]
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] No permanent flags permitted
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
| 39 UID STORE 31380 +FLAGS (\Seen)
| * 552 FETCH (UID 31380 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
| 52 UID STORE 6401 +FLAGS (\Seen)
| * 558 FETCH (UID 6401 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] No permanent flags permitted
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
| 147 UID STORE 31381 +FLAGS (\Seen)
| * 553 FETCH (UID 31381 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] No permanent flags permitted
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] No permanent flags permitted
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
| 310 UID STORE 6402 +FLAGS (\Seen)
| * 559 FETCH (UID 6402 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
| * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
| * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
| 335 UID STORE 31382:31387 +FLAGS (\Seen)
| * 554 FETCH (UID 31382 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * 555 FETCH (UID 31383 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * 556 FETCH (UID 31384 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * 557 FETCH (UID 31385 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * 558 FETCH (UID 31386 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
| * 559 FETCH (UID 31387 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
`----
There is no invalid SPC between brackets.
> I suspect this has been fixed long time ago. If you can find out
> which version your server is, I can update the web page.
I use Debian Woody's Courier IMAP server, the version is 1.4.3.
HTH,
Marcus
--
"Es soll kein unschuldig Blut vergossen werden, doch das Blut der Gottlosen
soll fließen in Strömen. Die Drei sollen ihre schwarzen Flügel spreizen und
werden der Hammer sein der Rache Gottes."
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, (continued)
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, David Magda, 2004/07/19
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/20
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Richard Watson, 2004/07/20
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/20
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Simon Josefsson, 2004/07/26
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/26
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Simon Josefsson, 2004/07/26
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP,
Marcus Frings <=
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Simon Josefsson, 2004/07/26
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/27
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Simon Josefsson, 2004/07/27
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/27
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/07/16
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/16
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/07/19
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/20
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/17
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/07/19