Re: bogofilter behavior

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Tue, 03 Aug 2004, reader@newsguy.com wrote:

> Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:
> 
>> It seems that the meaning of those have changed [2].  I hope that the
>> values in `spam.el' are suitable for current bogofilter:
>>
>> spam-bogofilter-spam-switch "-s"
>> spam-bogofilter-ham-switch "-n"
>> spam-bogofilter-spam-strong-switch "-S"
>> spam-bogofilter-ham-strong-switch "-N"
> 
> On the surface it would appear not...

In spam.el, we could either automatically get those from `bogofilter
-v' or allow the user to set a bogofilter-version that would set all
the switches.

What do you think?

Ted