[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogofilter behavior
From: |
Matthias Andree |
Subject: |
Re: bogofilter behavior |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:30:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
> Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:
>
>> ,----[ bogofilter(1) ]
>> | The -S option tells bogofilter to register the text
>> | presented on standard input as spam and to undo a prior
>> | registration of the same message as non-spam.
>> |
>> | The -N option tells bogofilter to register the text
>> | presented on standard input as non-spam and to undo a prior
>> | registration of the same message as spam.
>> `----
>
> Reiner on a closer look at the above citation I see it is direct
> conflict with my man page. Where did you get that from?
Reiner may have looked at an oldish version perhaps. bogofilter options
have changed in the past - and that's one of the reasons why
bogofilter's version still has a 0 in front although it is closing up on
its 2nd anniversary.
--
Matthias Andree
Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)
- Re: bogofilter behavior, (continued)
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/04
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/04
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/05
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/05
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/08
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/09
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/10
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/10
- Re: bogofilter behavior,
Matthias Andree <=
Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/05