[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question to fancy-mail split
From: |
Josef Oswald |
Subject: |
Re: Question to fancy-mail split |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:45:14 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.5 (chayote, linux) |
Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 31 2004, Josef Oswald wrote:
>
>> like gnus@chello.at goes to group nnml+private:other, I would like that
>> _all_ e-mails coming from @chello.at address goes into the same group.
>>
>> I looked into fancy mail-splitting but it seems I need to know the
>> complete e-mail address to set up the split rules.
>
> Your impression is wrong. Maybe (if you'd post the relevant rules
> that you actually tried, we could do without guessing) your strings
> are missing a ".*" somewhere or you want to change
> `nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words':
Yes I was looking at that too
But I was not sure if I can use both at the same time?
This is how my rules start
(setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy )
(setq nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words t)
(setq nnmail-split-fancy
'(&
(|
well once I tried something like
(any "*@chello\\.at" "other") but since this did not work, ( and I din't
feel asking in the newsgroup I just forgot about it)
are you saying
(any "chello" "other") was/is all that is needed?
>
> ,----[ (info "(gnus)Fancy Mail Splitting") ]
> | `nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words' controls whether partial
> | words are matched during fancy splitting.
> |
> | Normally, regular expressions given in `nnmail-split-fancy' are
> | implicitly surrounded by `\<...\>' markers, which are word delimiters.
> | If this variable is true, they are not implicitly surrounded by
> | anything.
> |
> | (any "joe" "joemail")
> |
> | In this example, messages sent from `joedavis@foo.org' will normally
> | not be filed in `joemail'. With
> | `nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words' set to t, however, the match
> | will happen. In effect, the requirement of a word boundary is removed
> | and instead the match becomes more like a grep.
> `----
>
>> Josef Oswald also -> gnus@chello.at :-)
>> --
>
> How do you manage to get a broken signature separator in Gnus? Yours
> is "-- " while it should be "-- ".
I did not know that it was/is broken, you are the first person who made
the effort to tell me that this needs to be fixed as well :-)
I just wrote a file, maybe I hit once to many the space bar, writing it.
>
> Bye, Reiner.
Josef Oswald also -> gnus@chello.at :-)
--
Gnus gives you all the opportunity you could possibly want for
shooting yourself in the foot.
--from the INFO --