Re: gnus-article-decode-hook

[Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk]

Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:

> Maybe using a different hook instead of `gnus-article-decode-hook'
> gives better results.
>
> ,----[ M-x apropos-variable RET gnus-article.*hook RET ]
> | gnus-article-decode-hook
> |   Variable: *Hook run to decode charsets in articles.
> | [...]
> | gnus-article-prepare-hook
> |   Variable: *A hook called after an article has been prepared in the
> |   article buffer.

When hooking gnus-article-prepare-hook, message-field-value doesn't
return the correct answer, as if the current buffer didn't contain the
same thing as when hooking gnus-article-decode-hook.

And if I hook gnus-article-outlook-deuglify-article directly, the
minibuffer says "Lisp nesting exceeds max-lisp-eval-depth" after
entering the article, which is nevertheless deuglified correctly.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/