[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus
From: |
Frank Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:19:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Peter Petersen <ppetersen@despammed.com> writes:
> Somewhere while googling I read that fonts such as bitstream vera sans
> mono don't look good in emacs, because emacs doesn't work with Xft,
> whereas this font looks great in applications like opera, firefox etc.
You could try to get a freetype library with truetype hinting enabled,
perhaps Bitstream Vera Sans Mono looks better then.
--
Did you ever realize how much text fits in eighty columns? If you now consider
that a signature usually consists of up to four lines, this gives you enough
space to spread a tremendous amount of information with your messages. So seize
this opportunity and don't waste your signature with bullshit nobody will read.
- bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Peter Petersen, 2005/03/13
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Frank Schmitt, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Peter Petersen, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus,
Frank Schmitt <=
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Peter Petersen, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Aidan Kehoe, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Aidan Kehoe, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Peter Petersen, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Aidan Kehoe, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Miles Bader, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Jochem Huhmann, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Miles Bader, 2005/03/14
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/15
- Re: bitstream vera sans mono ugly in gnus, Frank Thieme, 2005/03/15