[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication
From: |
Hadron Quark |
Subject: |
Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:05:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 22 2006, Hadron Quark wrote:
>
>> Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:
>>> I don't think there is any difference between the smtpmail stuff in
>>> Gnus CVS compared to Emacs CVS.
>>
>> heres a funny thing : I had Gnus from CVS locally and in my .emacs added
>> ti specificall to the loadpath. gnus-version said 0.6.
>>
>> Now I removed the loadline, and use emacs-snapshot, gnus is back at 0.4
>>
>> I think some paths are screwed somewhere by debian install : I have no
>> idea how to check
>
> `M-x list-load-path-shadows RET' and check for "gnus".
>
>> or fix it, so it can stay as it is - everything works ok ( for now).
>
> The current CVS trunk version identifies itself as "No Gnus v0.6".
> The version in Emacs CVS is "Gnus 5.11", which corresponds to the
> stable branch "v5-10" in Gnus' CVS.
>
> I'd recommend to either use the (stable) Gnus 5.11 which is bundled
> with Emacs CVS. If you want to keep up with development version you
> should use the current CVS version, not an outdated development
> version like No Gnus 0.4.
I put the load path back in my emacs to point to my local gnus.
but why on earth would emacs-snapshot have a 22.0.50 emacs but allow 0.4
gnus? According to my load path, there is a
usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/gnus, but unlike cedet and some other
stuff the gnus subdirectoy is not on the load path.
A failing in the emacs-snapshot install package perhaps?
>
> Bye, Reiner.
> --
> ,,,
> (o o)
> ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
--
- smtpmail, starttls authentication, Phillip Lord, 2006/08/21
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Hadron Quark, 2006/08/21
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Reiner Steib, 2006/08/22
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Hadron Quark, 2006/08/22
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Reiner Steib, 2006/08/22
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication,
Hadron Quark <=
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Reiner Steib, 2006/08/23
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Hadron Quark, 2006/08/23
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Reiner Steib, 2006/08/24
- Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Hadron Quark, 2006/08/24
Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Phillip Lord, 2006/08/22
Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, Leon, 2006/08/22
Re: smtpmail, starttls authentication, wmaple, 2006/08/29