[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is BBDB alive? is bbdb-gnus alive?
From: |
Matan Ninio |
Subject: |
Re: is BBDB alive? is bbdb-gnus alive? |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:38:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 31 2006, Matan Ninio wrote:
>
>> Both seem quite dead, which is sad.
>
> As for BBDS, please read
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user/1841/focus=1859>.
Thanks. I donated one of the last patches, and was been a long time
ago. with no change in several years and links rotting away, it's hard
to know.
>
>> I use bbdb and bbdb based splitting of emails, and have been very
>> happy with both. I'm now forced to move my backend from nnml to
>> nnmaildir (or nnimap), and I see no support for this in bbdb. As a
>> matter of fact, I cant seem to locate the nnmaildir equivalent of
>> nnmail-split at all.
>>
>> Or did I miss the point somewhere?
>
> Most mail-backends (including nnmaildir) use the methods described in
> (info "(gnus)Splitting Mail") and (info "(gnus)Fancy Mail Splitting").
> For nnimap, see (info "(gnus)Splitting in IMAP").
I've read the above several times prior to posting here. I clearly got
nnml and nnmail mixed up, that I already figured out. But I still have
a problem locating the way to set the default backend for splitting.
Right now, if I try to use "B r" (gnus-summary-respool-article) with
nnml as the backend, it works just fine, but if I try to use nnmaildir
as the backend, I dont get the email delivered to the right place,
and I don't get a message reporting where the email was saved (as I do
with nnml).
any clues?
>
> Bye, Reiner.
> --
> ,,,
> (o o)
> ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
--
Matan Ninio
-----------------------------------------
VI VI VI - The Roman Number of The Beast