[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Option for sendmail.el
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Option for sendmail.el |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:08:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Memnon Anon
<gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com> wrote:
MA> On 14 Jul., 16:16, Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com> wrote:
>> Can you call (message-make-fqdn) (hit `C-x C-e' after the closing
>> parenthesis)? Also call (message-user-mail-address) and let us know
>> what they say. Finally, what's the value of user-mail-address (use
>> `C-h v' to find out)?
MA> Output:
MA> (message-make-fqdn): machinename.localdomain
MA> (message-user-mail-address): my set email address. This one seems
MA> right
MA> C-h v of user-mail-address: same output as (message-user-mail-address)
MA> email address is set via (setq user-mail-address
MA> "myemailname@myprovider.com")
OK, I found the problem. The priority order is not what I thought. Set
message-user-fqdn to what you need. My fault, I misremembered the
code.
MA> I guess it is my fault. Configuring .gnus files and having no clue
MA> of gnus, just following different recipes on the web, is not that
MA> smart.
MA> But hey, changing smtpmail.el works. No one ever said using
MA> Emacs/gnus is easy; all they said is: whatever the problem, you may
MA> find a solution ;).
Gnus is, I'm afraid, fairly complex :) It's one of the most interesting
parts of Emacs IMHO.
Fortunately, it gets much simpler once you understand the way it works.
Ted
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/04
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, renaudr, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/08
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/09
- Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/11
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/17