[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ``Quips'' in signatures
From: |
Richard Riley |
Subject: |
Re: ``Quips'' in signatures |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:00:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Joe Fineman <joe_f@verizon.net> writes:
> Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Joe Fineman <joe_f@verizon.net> writes:
>>
>>> Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>> Ah yes, I use posting styles
>>>
>>> -- whatever they are --
>>>
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?q=gnus+posting+styles
>
> Of the first page brought up (10 of 987,000 results), only one even
> pretends to explain what a posting style is, and that one, on
> inspection, turns out to start in the middle of a conversation.
>
> Such is the state of documentation as viewed from outside the
> profession. I do not mean to imply that that is a peculiar vice of
> free software. I never even *try* to get help with Microsoft Word.
The very first hit takes you to the gnus posting styles manual entry:
http://www.gnus.org/manual/gnus_153.html
>From there it's a question of, well, reading and cross indexing ...
You're not winding me up here are you? :-)
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, (continued)
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Richard Riley, 2009/08/17
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Joe Fineman, 2009/08/18
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Richard Riley, 2009/08/18
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Joe Fineman, 2009/08/19
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Richard Riley, 2009/08/20
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Joe Fineman, 2009/08/20
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Richard Riley, 2009/08/24
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Joe Fineman, 2009/08/24
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures,
Richard Riley <=
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Joe Fineman, 2009/08/25
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Richard Riley, 2009/08/26
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Lowell Gilbert, 2009/08/24
- Re: ``Quips'' in signatures, Richard Riley, 2009/08/24