[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?
From: |
Kendall Shaw |
Subject: |
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:10:50 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:50:47 -0800, Frank wrote:
>
>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>
>>> Oh, I see. I don't think IMAP is involved. Can you test without any
>>> IMAP servers, rules, or settings? I haven't experienced this issue
>>> myself. It does seem like Gnus is picking up your incoming mail, but
>>> not because of any nnimap-related things.
>
>> I don't know what I would be testing without imap. Gnus does appear to
>> move messages from my mbox file using nnml, as if I were not using
>> imap. If it continued to do that without imap, what would that tell
>> me?
>
> How have you configured the variables gnus-select-method,
> gnus-secondary-select-methods and mail-sources?
Thank you.
(setq gnus-select-method '(nntp "news.evilmegacorp.com"))
(setq gnus-secondary-select-methods
'((nnml "mail")
(nnimap "asdf"
(nnimap-address "localhost")
(nnimap-server-port 143)
(nnimap-stream network))))
and mail-sources is nil
I had a thought that it might be defaulting to reading /var/mail/user. So, as a
test, I set:
(setq nnmail-spool-file '("/var/mail/empty"))
where /var/mail/empty is an empty file, with appropriate permissions
and ownership. But it still empties my imap inbox. The email seems to
go into ~/Mail/Incomingxyz.
Before that, I had:
(setq nnmail-spool-file nil)
(setq nnmail-get-new-mail nil)
and got the inbox emptied, but mail is copied to nnml inbox.
- Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/06
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/06
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?,
Kendall Shaw <=
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08